The Law Office of Lisa A. Vance, P.C.

The Path to Your Piece of Mind
Divorce and Family Law Matters

We are now accepting clients statewide in Texas.


As the situation with COVID-19 continues to develop and evolve, the safety, health and well-being of our clients and our team is extremely important to us. We are watching for the guidance of the Centers for Disease Control and international medical experts to learn how we can best manage our facility and our clients.

We would like to reassure you that The Law Office of Lisa A. Vance, P.C. will continue to be available to provide services to all of our clients.

Our lawyers and paralegals are working in the office and electronically, although most of us are working from home. Below is a list of FAQs regarding our response and commitment to you during COVID-19.

Can I even have a consultation with my lawyer remotely?

Yes, The Office of Lisa A. Vance, P.C. has a comprehensive remote working capability and all of our lawyers and paralegals are equipped to work securely from home.

Will my lawyer be available to answer questions and work on my case?

Yes, your legal matters will continue to receive our attention. You can email, call, or videoconference with your lawyer during this time.

We also have multiple videoconferencing options; please contact your attorney for the platform that works best for you

How are court hearings and appointments affected?

Court in Bexar County are now conducted by Zoom Please see our blog article Court via Zoom: It’s Actually, Really Court (and Here’s How It Works)

Can I consult with a lawyer about a new family law or divorce matter?

Yes, we have office staff working in house and remotely to ensure continuity in our business. For information about a family law or divorce matter, please call our office or complete the Request a Consultation Form.

Your family law matters remain our top concern and we are not going to permit this pandemic to take priority over your needs. We will remain confident, alert and prepared.

We wish you and your family well as we work through this difficult situation together.

With warm regards,
Lisa A Vance



Family Law
Click For More

Rest of Life
Click For More

Fathers claim they were denied rights in custody hearing

| Feb 13, 2015 | Fathers' Rights |

Six fathers are taking on the state of New Jersey because they believe that their constitutional rights have been violated. The men are claiming that they lost custody of their children without a full hearing, having only been accused of actions or crimes that would make them unfit parents. While the fathers eventually got the hearings for their crimes, said hearings occurred well after they were denied custody, months or even years in some cases.

You have probably heard the phrase “best interests of the child” before, especially if you have ever dealt with matters of child custody. This is the standard determinate by which courts usually decide the custody agreement, including in Texas whether or not the parents enter a joint managing conservatorship or a sole managing conservatorship. However, some parents take issue with this method, since judges determine what they think is best for the child, many feel that the courts have too much discretion to do whatever they want.

While this case is happening in New Jersey, it is still important to be aware of such goings on, as similar issues could befall Texas residents. Nobody wants to be told that they cannot be part of their child?s life anymore, and the courts are aware of that. Despite what some people may feel, the judge is not out to get them, and they do make the best decision they can with the evidence they are presented.

This is why it is important to contact an attorney when you are going through a custody dispute, especially if you are a father who fears you will face discrimination when it comes to custody matters. Consulting with a legal professional can ensure that you present all of the evidence you need in order to get the custody arrangement you deserve.

Source:, “Fathers claim N.J. family court judges violated their constitutional rights,” Brent Johnson, Feb. 5, 2015

Request A Consultation



FindLaw Network